(Image: Zen Buddha Silence by Marilyn Barbone.)
September 8, 2019
Jack Bogle and Warren Buffett correctly maintain that most investors should invest in an S&P 500 index fund. An index fund will allow you to outpace 90-95% of all active investors—net of costs—over the course of 4-5 decades. This is purely a function of cost. Active investors as a group will do the same as the S&P 500, but that is before costs. After costs, active investors will do about 2.5% worse per year than the index.
An index fund is a wise choice. But you can do much better if you invest in a best college application essays go site the best cv writing services in uk google research paper viagra viruses essay dissertation go here for imperialism essay viagra long https://sigma-instruments.com/viagra-pills-for-sale-nz-5360/ http://www.safeembrace.org/mdrx/cialis-soft-meilleur-prix/68/ pro choice argument essayВ global typing assignments comparison essay thesis see url go to site https://www.platinumed.com/mentrial/buy-a-strattera-no-prescription-no-membership/29/ custodial assistant resume how to write a summary in college doktorarbeit zahnmedizin bonn follow url thesis on design go here research paper example for high school cialis zuzahlung go here generic cialis description custom essay uk go site thesis ghostwriter sites https://healthimperatives.org/rxstore/research-viagra/71/ geography ghostwriter sites quantitative microcap value strategy—focused on undervalued microcap stocks with improving fundamentals. If you adopt such an approach, you can outperform the S&P 500 by roughly 7% per year. For details, see: http://boolefund.com/cheap-solid-microcaps-far-outperform-sp-500/
But this can only work if you have the ability to ignore volatility and stay focused on the very long term.
“Investing is simple but not easy.” — Warren Buffett
(Photo by USA International Trade Administration)
Assume the S&P 500 index will return 8% per year over the coming decades. The average active approach will produce roughly 5.5% per year. A quantitative microcap approach—cheap micro caps with improving fundamentals—will generate about 15% per year.
What would happen if you invested $50,000 for the next 30 years in one of these approaches?
|Investment Strategy||Beginning Value||Ending Value|
|S&P 500 Index||$50,000||$503,133|
As you can see, investing $50,000 in an index fund will produce $503,133, which is more than ten times what you started with. Furthermore, $503,133 is more than twice $249,198, which would be the result from the average active fund.
However, if you invested $50,000 in a quantitative microcap strategy, you would end up with $3,310,589. This is more than 66 times what you started with, and it’s more than 6.5 times greater than the result from the index fund.
You could either invest in a quantitative microcap approach or you could invest in an index fund. You’ll do fine either way. Or you could invest part of your portfolio in the microcap strategy and part in an index fund.
What’s the catch?
For most of us as investors, our biggest enemy is ourselves. Let me explain. Since 1945, there have been 27 corrections where stocks dropped 10% to 20%, and there have been 11 bear markets where stocks dropped more than 20%. The stock market has always recovered and gone on to new highs. However, many investors have gotten scared and sold their investments after stocks have dropped 10-20%+.
Edgar Wachenheim, in the great book Common Stocks and Common Sense, gives the following example:
The financial crisis during the fall of 2008 and the winter of 2009 is an extreme (and outlier) example of volatility. During the six months between the end of August 2008 and end of February 2009, the [S&P] 500 Index fell by 42 percent from 1,282.83 to 735.09. Yet by early 2011 the S&P 500 had recovered to the 1,280 level, and by August 2014 it had appreciated to the 2000 level. An investor who purchased the S&P 500 Index on August 31, 2008, and then sold the Index six years later, lived through the worst financial crisis and recession since the Great Depression, but still earned a 56 percent profit on his investment before including dividends—and 69 percent including the dividends… During the six-year period August 2008 through August 2014, the stock market provided an average annual return of 11.1 percent—above the range of normalcy in spite of the abnormal horrors and consequences of the financial crisis and resulting deep recession.
If you can stay the course through a 25% drop and even through a 40%+ drop, and remain focused on the very long term, then you should invest primarily in stocks, whether via an index fund, a quantitative microcap value fund, or some other investment vehicle.
The best way to stay focused on the very long term is simply to ignore the stock market entirely. All you need to know or believe is:
- The U. S. and global economies will continue to grow, mainly due to improvements in technology.
- After every correction or bear market—no matter how severe—the stock market has always recovered and gone on to new highs.
If you’re unable to ignore the stock market, and if you might get scared and sell during a correction or bear market—don’t worry if you’re in this category since many investors are—then you should try to invest a manageable portion of your liquid assets in stocks. Perhaps investing 50% or 25% of your liquid assets in stocks will allow you to stay the course through the inevitable corrections and bear markets.
The best-performing investors will be those who can invest for the very long term—several decades or more—and who don’t worry about (or even pay any attention to) the inevitable corrections and bear markets along the way. In fact, Fidelity did a study of its many retail accounts. It found that the best-performing accounts were owned by investors who literally forgot that they had an account!
- Note: If you were to buy and hold twenty large-cap stocks chosen at random, your long-term performance would be very close to the S&P 500 Index. (The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a basket of thirty large-cap stocks.)
If you’re going to be investing for a few decades or more, and if you can basically ignore the stock market in the meantime, then you should invest fully in stocks. Your best long-term investment is an index fund, a quantitative microcap value fund, or a combination of the two.
If you can largely ignore volatility, then you should consider investing primarily in a quantitative microcap value fund. This is very likely to produce far better long-term performance than an S&P 500 index fund.
Many top investors—including Warren Buffett, perhaps the greatest investors of all time—earned the highest returns of their career when they could invest in microcap stocks. Buffett has said that he’d still be investing in micro caps if he were managing small sums.
To learn more about Buffett getting his highest returns mainly from undervalued microcaps, here’s a link to my favorite blog post: http://boolefund.com/buffetts-best-microcap-cigar-butts/
The Boole Microcap Fund that I manage is a quantitative microcap value fund. For details on the quantitative investment process, see: http://boolefund.com/why-invest-in-boole-microcap/
Although the S&P 500 index appears rather high—a bear market in the next year or two wouldn’t be a surprise—the positions in the Boole Fund are quite undervalued. When looking at the next 3 to 5 years, I’ve never been more excited about the prospects of the Boole Fund relative to the S&P 500—regardless of whether the index is up, down, or flat.
(The S&P 500 may be flat for 5 years or even 10 years, but after that, as you move further into the future, eventually there’s more than a 99% chance that the index will be in positive territory. The longer your time horizon, the less risky stocks are.)
BOOLE MICROCAP FUND
An equal weighted group of micro caps generally far outperforms an equal weighted (or cap-weighted) group of larger stocks over time. See the historical chart here: http://boolefund.com/best-performers-microcap-stocks/
This outperformance increases significantly by focusing on cheap micro caps. Performance can be further boosted by isolating cheap microcap companies that show improving fundamentals. We rank microcap stocks based on these and similar criteria.
There are roughly 10-20 positions in the portfolio. The size of each position is determined by its rank. Typically the largest position is 15-20% (at cost), while the average position is 8-10% (at cost). Positions are held for 3 to 5 years unless a stock approaches intrinsic value sooner or an error has been discovered.
The mission of the Boole Fund is to outperform the S&P 500 Index by at least 5% per year (net of fees) over 5-year periods. We also aim to outpace the Russell Microcap Index by at least 2% per year (net). The Boole Fund has low fees.
If you are interested in finding out more, please e-mail me or leave a comment.
My e-mail: email@example.com
Disclosures: Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. All investments contain risk and may lose value. This material is distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Boole Capital, LLC.